2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <metal_stdlib>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace metal;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define MAX(x, y) ((x) > (y) ? (x) : (y))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define QK4_0 32
|
|
|
|
#define QR4_0 2
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // delta
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK4_0 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
|
|
|
|
} block_q4_0;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-10 10:28:11 +02:00
|
|
|
#define QK4_1 32
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // delta
|
|
|
|
half m; // min
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK4_1 / 2]; // nibbles / quants
|
|
|
|
} block_q4_1;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
#define QK8_0 32
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // delta
|
|
|
|
int8_t qs[QK8_0]; // quants
|
|
|
|
} block_q8_0;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_add(
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float4 * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float4 * dst,
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = src0[tpig] + src1[tpig];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-23 13:00:37 +02:00
|
|
|
// assumption: src1 is a row
|
|
|
|
// broadcast src1 into src0
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_add_row(
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float4 * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float4 * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & nb,
|
2023-07-23 13:00:37 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = src0[tpig] + src1[tpig % nb];
|
2023-07-23 13:00:37 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul(
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float4 * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float4 * dst,
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = src0[tpig] * src1[tpig];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assumption: src1 is a row
|
|
|
|
// broadcast src1 into src0
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_row(
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float4 * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float4 * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & nb,
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
2023-09-01 12:42:41 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = src0[tpig] * src1[tpig % nb];
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_scale(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant float & scale,
|
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = src0[tpig] * scale;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_silu(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
float x = src0[tpig];
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = x / (1.0f + exp(-x));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_relu(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = max(0.0f, src0[tpig]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-09 10:00:51 +02:00
|
|
|
constant float GELU_COEF_A = 0.044715f;
|
|
|
|
constant float SQRT_2_OVER_PI = 0.79788456080286535587989211986876f;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_gelu(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
uint tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
float x = src0[tpig];
|
2023-08-23 22:08:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BEWARE !!!
|
|
|
|
// Simply using "tanh" instead of "precise::tanh" will sometimes results in NaNs!
|
|
|
|
// This was observed with Falcon 7B and 40B models
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
dst[tpig] = 0.5f*x*(1.0f + precise::tanh(SQRT_2_OVER_PI*x*(1.0f + GELU_COEF_A*x*x)));
|
2023-06-09 10:00:51 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_soft_max(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
threadgroup float * buf [[threadgroup(0)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i03 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tgpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const float * psrc0 = src0 + i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
device float * pdst = dst + i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// parallel max
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] = -INFINITY;
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg[0]; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg[0]) {
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] = MAX(buf[tpitg[0]], psrc0[i00]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// reduce
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
for (uint i = ntg[0]/2; i > 0; i /= 2) {
|
|
|
|
if (tpitg[0] < i) {
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] = MAX(buf[tpitg[0]], buf[tpitg[0] + i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
//// broadcast - not needed. There is a threadgroup barrier above in the last iteration of
|
|
|
|
// the loop, and when that is done, buf[0] has the correct (synchronized) value
|
|
|
|
//if (tpitg[0] == 0) {
|
|
|
|
// buf[0] = buf[0];
|
|
|
|
//}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
//threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float max = buf[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// parallel sum
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] = 0.0f;
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg[0]; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg[0]) {
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
const float exp_psrc0 = exp(psrc0[i00] - max);
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] += exp_psrc0;
|
|
|
|
// Remember the result of exp here. exp is expensive, so we really do not
|
|
|
|
// whish to compute it twice.
|
|
|
|
pdst[i00] = exp_psrc0;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// reduce
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
for (uint i = ntg[0]/2; i > 0; i /= 2) {
|
|
|
|
if (tpitg[0] < i) {
|
|
|
|
buf[tpitg[0]] += buf[tpitg[0] + i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
// broadcast - not needed, see above
|
|
|
|
//// broadcast
|
|
|
|
//if (tpitg[0] == 0) {
|
|
|
|
// buf[0] = buf[0];
|
|
|
|
//}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
//threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float sum = buf[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg[0]; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg[0]) {
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
pdst[i00] /= sum;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_diag_mask_inf(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int & n_past,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpig[[thread_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i00 = tpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i00 > n_past + i01) {
|
|
|
|
dst[i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00 + i00] = -INFINITY;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
dst[i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00 + i00] = src0[i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00 + i00];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_norm(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant float & eps,
|
|
|
|
threadgroup float * sum [[threadgroup(0)]],
|
|
|
|
uint tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
device const float * x = (device const float *) ((device const char *) src0 + tgpig*nb01);
|
|
|
|
// MEAN
|
|
|
|
// parallel sum
|
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] = 0.0f;
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg) {
|
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] += x[i00];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// reduce
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
for (uint i = ntg/2; i > 0; i /= 2) {
|
|
|
|
if (tpitg < i) {
|
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] += sum[tpitg + i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-07 15:42:42 +02:00
|
|
|
const float mean = sum[0] / ne00;
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-07 15:42:42 +02:00
|
|
|
// recenter and VARIANCE
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
device float * y = dst + tgpig*ne00;
|
2023-09-07 14:49:09 +02:00
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] = 0.0f;
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg) {
|
2023-09-07 15:42:42 +02:00
|
|
|
y[i00] = x[i00] - mean;
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] += y[i00] * y[i00];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
// reduce
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
for (uint i = ntg/2; i > 0; i /= 2) {
|
|
|
|
if (tpitg < i) {
|
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] += sum[tpitg + i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-07 15:42:42 +02:00
|
|
|
const float variance = sum[0] / ne00;
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float scale = 1.0f/sqrt(variance + eps);
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg) {
|
|
|
|
y[i00] = y[i00] * scale;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_rms_norm(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant float & eps,
|
|
|
|
threadgroup float * sum [[threadgroup(0)]],
|
|
|
|
uint tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float4 * x = (device const float4 *) ((device const char *) src0 + tgpig*nb01);
|
|
|
|
device const float * x_scalar = (device const float *) x;
|
|
|
|
float4 sumf=0;
|
|
|
|
float all_sum=0;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// parallel sum
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg; i00 < ne00/4; i00 += ntg) {
|
|
|
|
sumf += x[i00] * x[i00];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
all_sum = sumf[0] + sumf[1] + sumf[2] + sumf[3];
|
|
|
|
all_sum = simd_sum(all_sum);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
sum[sgitg] = all_sum;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
// broadcast, simd group number is ntg / 32
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
for (uint i = ntg / 32 / 2; i > 0; i /= 2) {
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
if (tpitg < i) {
|
|
|
|
sum[tpitg] += sum[tpitg + i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (tpitg == 0) {
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = 4 * (ne00 / 4); i < ne00; i++) {sum[0] += x_scalar[i];}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
sum[0] /= ne00;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float mean = sum[0];
|
|
|
|
const float scale = 1.0f/sqrt(mean + eps);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device float4 * y = (device float4 *) (dst + tgpig*ne00);
|
|
|
|
device float * y_scalar = (device float *) y;
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = tpitg; i00 < ne00/4; i00 += ntg) {
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
y[i00] = x[i00] * scale;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
if (tpitg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i00 = 4 * (ne00 / 4); i00 < ne00; i00++) {y_scalar[i00] = x_scalar[i00] * scale;}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
// function for calculate inner product between half a q4_0 block and 16 floats (yl), sumy is SUM(yl[i])
|
|
|
|
// il indicates where the q4 quants begin (0 or QK4_0/4)
|
|
|
|
// we assume that the yl's have been multiplied with the appropriate scale factor
|
|
|
|
// that corresponds to the missing bit shifts (1, 1/16, 1/256, 1/4096)
|
|
|
|
inline float block_q_n_dot_y(device const block_q4_0 * qb_curr, float sumy, thread float * yl, int il) {
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
float d = qb_curr->d;
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
float2 acc = 0.f;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = ((device const uint16_t *)qb_curr + 1 + il/2);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i+=2) {
|
|
|
|
acc[0] += yl[i + 0] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x000F)
|
|
|
|
+ yl[i + 1] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x0F00);
|
|
|
|
acc[1] += yl[i + 8] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x00F0)
|
|
|
|
+ yl[i + 9] * (qs[i / 2] & 0xF000);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
return d * (sumy * -8.f + acc[0] + acc[1]);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
// function for calculate inner product between half a q4_1 block and 16 floats (yl), sumy is SUM(yl[i])
|
|
|
|
// il indicates where the q4 quants begin (0 or QK4_0/4)
|
|
|
|
// we assume that the yl's have been multiplied with the appropriate scale factor
|
|
|
|
// that corresponds to the missing bit shifts (1, 1/16, 1/256, 1/4096)
|
|
|
|
inline float block_q_n_dot_y(device const block_q4_1 * qb_curr, float sumy, thread float * yl, int il) {
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
float d = qb_curr->d;
|
|
|
|
float m = qb_curr->m;
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = ((device const uint16_t *)qb_curr + 2 + il/2);
|
|
|
|
float2 acc = 0.f;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i+=2) {
|
|
|
|
acc[0] += yl[i + 0] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x000F)
|
|
|
|
+ yl[i + 1] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x0F00);
|
|
|
|
acc[1] += yl[i + 8] * (qs[i / 2] & 0x00F0)
|
|
|
|
+ yl[i + 9] * (qs[i / 2] & 0xF000);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
return d * (acc[0] + acc[1]) + sumy * m;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-12 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
// putting them in the kernel cause a significant performance penalty
|
|
|
|
#define N_DST 4 // each SIMD group works on 4 rows
|
|
|
|
#define N_SIMDGROUP 2 // number of SIMD groups in a thread group
|
|
|
|
#define N_SIMDWIDTH 32 // assuming SIMD group size is 32
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
//Note: This is a template, but strictly speaking it only applies to
|
|
|
|
// quantizations where the block size is 32. It also does not
|
|
|
|
// giard against the number of rows not being divisible by
|
|
|
|
// N_DST, so this is another explicit assumption of the implementation.
|
|
|
|
template<typename block_q_type, int nr, int nsg, int nw>
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
void mul_vec_q_n_f32(device const void * src0, device const float * src1, device float * dst,
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
int64_t ne00, int64_t ne01, int64_t ne02, int64_t ne10, int64_t ne12, int64_t ne0, int64_t ne1, uint gqa,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig, uint tiisg, uint sgitg) {
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK4_0;
|
2023-07-12 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int im = tgpig.z;
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * nsg + sgitg) * nr;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = first_row * nb + im/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q_type * x = (device const block_q_type *) src0 + offset0;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + im*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[16]; // src1 vector cache
|
|
|
|
float sumf[nr]={0.f};
|
2023-07-12 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/2;
|
|
|
|
const int il = 8*(tiisg%2);
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * yb = y + ix * QK4_0 + il;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
// each thread in a SIMD group deals with half a block.
|
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += nw/2) {
|
2023-07-14 11:46:21 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumy = 0;
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
|
|
|
|
sumy += yb[i] + yb[i+1];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+0] = yb[i+ 0];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+1] = yb[i+ 1]/256.f;
|
|
|
|
sumy += yb[i+16] + yb[i+17];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+8] = yb[i+16]/16.f;
|
|
|
|
yl[i+9] = yb[i+17]/4096.f;
|
2023-07-12 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-14 11:46:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < nr; row++) {
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += block_q_n_dot_y(x+ib+row*nb, sumy, yl, il);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yb += QK4_0 * 16;
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-14 11:46:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-25 12:48:29 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < nr; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0 && first_row + row < ne01) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + im*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = tot;
|
2023-07-12 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q4_0_f32(
|
2023-06-10 10:28:11 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-07-14 11:46:21 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-14 11:46:21 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
mul_vec_q_n_f32<block_q4_0, N_DST, N_SIMDGROUP, N_SIMDWIDTH>(src0,src1,dst,ne00,ne01,ne02,ne10,ne12,ne0,ne1,gqa,tgpig,tiisg,sgitg);
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-10 10:28:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q4_1_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-20 12:32:22 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
mul_vec_q_n_f32<block_q4_1, N_DST, N_SIMDGROUP, N_SIMDWIDTH>(src0,src1,dst,ne00,ne01,ne02,ne10,ne12,ne0,ne1,gqa,tgpig,tiisg,sgitg);
|
2023-06-10 10:28:11 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
#define NB_Q8_0 8
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q8_0_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int nr = N_DST;
|
|
|
|
const int nsg = N_SIMDGROUP;
|
|
|
|
const int nw = N_SIMDWIDTH;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK8_0;
|
|
|
|
const int r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int r1 = tgpig.y;
|
|
|
|
const int im = tgpig.z;
|
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * nsg + sgitg) * nr;
|
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = first_row * nb + im/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q8_0 * x = (device const block_q8_0 *) src0 + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + im*ne00*ne1;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[NB_Q8_0];
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf[nr]={0.f};
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/4;
|
|
|
|
const int il = tiisg%4;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * yb = y + ix * QK8_0 + NB_Q8_0*il;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
// each thread in a SIMD group deals with NB_Q8_0 quants at a time
|
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += nw/4) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < NB_Q8_0; ++i) {
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
yl[i] = yb[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < nr; row++) {
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device const int8_t * qs = x[ib+row*nb].qs + NB_Q8_0*il;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumq = 0.f;
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int iq = 0; iq < NB_Q8_0; ++iq) {
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
sumq += qs[iq] * yl[iq];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += sumq*x[ib+row*nb].d;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
yb += NB_Q8_0 * nw;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < nr; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0 && first_row + row < ne01) {
|
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + im*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = tot;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_f16_f32_1row(
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
device const char * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const char * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
2023-08-01 09:43:12 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne11,
|
2023-08-01 09:43:12 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12,
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb10,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb11,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb12,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]]) {
|
2023-06-09 09:39:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r1 = tgpig.y;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t im = tgpig.z;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-01 09:43:12 +02:00
|
|
|
device const half * x = (device const half *) (src0 + r0*nb01 + im/(ne12/ne02)*nb02);
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) (src1 + r1*nb11 + im*nb12);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf = 0;
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ne00 < 128) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = tiisg; i < ne00; i += 32) {
|
|
|
|
sumf += (float) x[i] * (float) y[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
float all_sum = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
dst[im*ne1*ne0 + r1*ne0 + r0] = all_sum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
device const half4 * x4 = (device const half4 *) x;
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * y4 = (device const float4 *) y;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = tiisg; i < ne00/4; i += 32) {
|
|
|
|
for (int k = 0; k < 4; ++k) sumf += (float)x4[i][k] * y4[i][k];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
float all_sum = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 4*(ne00/4); i < ne00; ++i) all_sum += (float) x[i] * y[i];
|
|
|
|
dst[im*ne1*ne0 + r1*ne0 + r0] = all_sum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-01 10:15:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
#define N_F16_F32 4
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_f16_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const char * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const char * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne11,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb10,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb11,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb12,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
const int64_t rb = tgpig.y*N_F16_F32;
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
const int64_t im = tgpig.z;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const half * x = (device const half *) (src0 + r0*nb01 + im/(ne12/ne02)*nb02);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
if (ne00 < 128) {
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_F16_F32; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
int r1 = rb + row;
|
|
|
|
if (r1 >= ne11) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) (src1 + r1*nb11 + im*nb12);
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = tiisg; i < ne00; i += 32) {
|
|
|
|
sumf += (float) x[i] * (float) y[i];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float all_sum = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
dst[im*ne1*ne0 + r1*ne0 + r0] = all_sum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 11:40:56 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
device const half4 * x4 = (device const half4 *)x;
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_F16_F32; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
int r1 = rb + row;
|
|
|
|
if (r1 >= ne11) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-03 12:23:33 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) (src1 + r1*nb11 + im*nb12);
|
|
|
|
device const float4 * y4 = (device const float4 *) y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float sumf = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = tiisg; i < ne00/4; i += 32) {
|
|
|
|
for (int k = 0; k < 4; ++k) sumf += (float) x4[i][k] * y4[i][k];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float all_sum = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 4*(ne00/4); i < ne00; ++i) all_sum += (float) x[i] * y[i];
|
|
|
|
dst[im*ne1*ne0 + r1*ne0 + r0] = all_sum;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_alibi_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne03,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb03,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne2,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne3,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb0,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb2,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb3,
|
|
|
|
constant float & m0,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i03 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tgpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t n = i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i3 = n / (ne2*ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i2 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0) / (ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i1 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0) / ne0;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i0 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0 - i1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device float * dst_data = (device float *) ((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
float m_k = pow(m0, i2 + 1);
|
|
|
|
for (int64_t i00 = tpitg.x; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg.x) {
|
|
|
|
device const float * src = (device float *)((device char *) src0 + i03*nb03 + i02*nb02 + i01*nb01 + i00*nb00);
|
|
|
|
dst_data[i00] = src[0] + m_k * (i00 - ne00 + 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_rope(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne03,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb03,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne2,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne3,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb0,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb2,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb3,
|
|
|
|
constant int & n_past,
|
|
|
|
constant int & n_dims,
|
|
|
|
constant int & mode,
|
llama : add custom RoPE (#2054)
* Implement customizable RoPE
The original RoPE has pre-defined parameters
theta_i = 10000^(−2(i−1)/d), for i in [1, 2, ..., d/2]
Our customizable RoPE, ggml_rope_custom_inplace, uses
theta_i = scale * base^(−2(i−1)/d), for i in [1, 2, ..., d/2]
with the default matches the original
scale = 1.0
base = 10000
The new command line arguments
--rope-freq-base
--rope-freq-scale
set the two new RoPE parameter.
Recent researches show changing these two parameters extends the context limit with minimal loss.
1. Extending Context to 8K
kaiokendev
https://kaiokendev.github.io/til#extending-context-to-8k
2. Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation
Shouyuan Chen, Sherman Wong, Liangjian Chen, Yuandong Tian
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15595
3. NTK-Aware Scaled RoPE allows LLaMA models to have extended (8k+) context size without any fine-tuning and minimal perplexity degradation.
https://www.reddit.com/user/bloc97
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/14lz7j5/ntkaware_scaled_rope_allows_llama_models_to_have/
For the bold, try adding the following command line parameters to your favorite model:
-c 16384 --rope-freq-base 80000 --rope-freq-scale 0.5
* ggml-metal: fix custom rope
* common: fix argument names in help
* llama: increase MEM_REQ_EVAL for MODEL_3B
It avoids crashing for quantized weights on CPU.
Better ways to calculate the required buffer size would be better.
* llama: make MEM_REQ_EVAL depend on n_ctx
* server: use proper Content-Type in curl examples
Without the header Content-Type: application/json, curl will POST with
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Though our simple server doesn't care, the httplib.h used has a limit
with CPPHTTPLIB_FORM_URL_ENCODED_PAYLOAD_MAX_LENGTH 8192
With Content-Type: application/json, we can send large json data.
* style : minor fixes, mostly indentations
* ggml : fix asserts
---------
Co-authored-by: Georgi Gerganov <ggerganov@gmail.com>
2023-07-15 12:34:16 +02:00
|
|
|
constant float & freq_base,
|
|
|
|
constant float & freq_scale,
|
2023-09-07 15:45:01 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiitg[[thread_index_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tptg[[threads_per_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i3 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i2 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i1 = tgpig[0];
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const bool is_neox = mode & 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t p = ((mode & 1) == 0 ? n_past + i2 : i2);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-07 15:45:01 +02:00
|
|
|
const float theta_0 = freq_scale * (float)p;
|
|
|
|
const float inv_ndims = -1.f/n_dims;
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!is_neox) {
|
2023-09-07 15:45:01 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int64_t i0 = 2*tiitg; i0 < ne0; i0 += 2*tptg.x) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float theta = theta_0 * pow(freq_base, inv_ndims*i0);
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const float cos_theta = cos(theta);
|
|
|
|
const float sin_theta = sin(theta);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const float * const src = (device float *)((device char *) src0 + i3*nb03 + i2*nb02 + i1*nb01 + i0*nb00);
|
|
|
|
device float * dst_data = (device float *)((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float x0 = src[0];
|
|
|
|
const float x1 = src[1];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dst_data[0] = x0*cos_theta - x1*sin_theta;
|
|
|
|
dst_data[1] = x0*sin_theta + x1*cos_theta;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2023-08-23 22:08:04 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int64_t ib = 0; ib < ne0/n_dims; ++ib) {
|
2023-09-07 15:45:01 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int64_t ic = 2*tiitg; ic < n_dims; ic += 2*tptg.x) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float theta = theta_0 * pow(freq_base, inv_ndims*ic - ib);
|
2023-08-23 22:08:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const float cos_theta = cos(theta);
|
|
|
|
const float sin_theta = sin(theta);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i0 = ib*n_dims + ic/2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const float * const src = (device float *)((device char *) src0 + i3*nb03 + i2*nb02 + i1*nb01 + i0*nb00);
|
|
|
|
device float * dst_data = (device float *)((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float x0 = src[0];
|
|
|
|
const float x1 = src[n_dims/2];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dst_data[0] = x0*cos_theta - x1*sin_theta;
|
|
|
|
dst_data[n_dims/2] = x0*sin_theta + x1*cos_theta;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-17 16:37:49 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_cpy_f16_f16(
|
|
|
|
device const half * src0,
|
|
|
|
device half * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne03,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb03,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne2,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne3,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb0,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb2,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb3,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i03 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tgpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t n = i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i3 = n / (ne2*ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i2 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0) / (ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i1 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0) / ne0;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i0 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0 - i1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device half * dst_data = (device half *) ((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int64_t i00 = tpitg.x; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg.x) {
|
|
|
|
device const half * src = (device half *)((device char *) src0 + i03*nb03 + i02*nb02 + i01*nb01 + i00*nb00);
|
|
|
|
dst_data[i00] = src[0];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-04 22:34:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_cpy_f32_f16(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device half * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne03,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb03,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne2,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne3,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb0,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb2,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb3,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i03 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tgpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t n = i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i3 = n / (ne2*ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i2 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0) / (ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i1 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0) / ne0;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i0 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0 - i1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device half * dst_data = (device half *) ((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int64_t i00 = tpitg.x; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg.x) {
|
|
|
|
device const float * src = (device float *)((device char *) src0 + i03*nb03 + i02*nb02 + i01*nb01 + i00*nb00);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dst_data[i00] = src[0];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_cpy_f32_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const float * src0,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne03,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb03,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne2,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne3,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb0,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb2,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb3,
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tpitg[[thread_position_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 ntg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i03 = tgpig[2];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i02 = tgpig[1];
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i01 = tgpig[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t n = i03*ne02*ne01*ne00 + i02*ne01*ne00 + i01*ne00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i3 = n / (ne2*ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i2 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0) / (ne1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i1 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0) / ne0;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t i0 = (n - i3*ne2*ne1*ne0 - i2*ne1*ne0 - i1*ne0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device float * dst_data = (device float *) ((device char *) dst + i3*nb3 + i2*nb2 + i1*nb1 + i0*nb0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int64_t i00 = tpitg.x; i00 < ne00; i00 += ntg.x) {
|
|
|
|
device const float * src = (device float *)((device char *) src0 + i03*nb03 + i02*nb02 + i01*nb01 + i00*nb00);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dst_data[i00] = src[0];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//============================================ k-quants ======================================================
|
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifndef QK_K
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
#define QK_K 256
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
static_assert(QK_K == 256 || QK_K == 64, "QK_K must be 256 or 64");
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
#define K_SCALE_SIZE 12
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define K_SCALE_SIZE 4
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // scales and mins, quantized with 4 bits
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/4]; // quants
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
|
|
|
|
half dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} block_q2_K;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// 84 bytes / block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
uint8_t hmask[QK_K/8]; // quants - high bit
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/4]; // quants - low 2 bits
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 64
|
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[2];
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[K_SCALE_SIZE]; // scales, quantized with 6 bits
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scale
|
|
|
|
} block_q3_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 64
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d[2]; // super-block scales/mins
|
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[2];
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // 4-bit quants
|
|
|
|
} block_q4_K;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
|
|
|
|
half dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[K_SCALE_SIZE]; // scales and mins, quantized with 6 bits
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // 4--bit quants
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} block_q4_K;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 64
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scales/mins
|
|
|
|
int8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // 8-bit block scales
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qh[QK_K/8]; // quants, high bit
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // quants, low 4 bits
|
|
|
|
} block_q5_K;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scale for quantized scales
|
|
|
|
half dmin; // super-block scale for quantized mins
|
|
|
|
uint8_t scales[3*QK_K/64]; // scales and mins, quantized with 6 bits
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qh[QK_K/8]; // quants, high bit
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qs[QK_K/2]; // quants, low 4 bits
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} block_q5_K;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// 176 bytes / block
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ql[QK_K/2]; // quants, lower 4 bits
|
|
|
|
uint8_t qh[QK_K/4]; // quants, upper 2 bits
|
|
|
|
int8_t scales[QK_K/16]; // scales, quantized with 8 bits
|
|
|
|
half d; // super-block scale
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
} block_q6_K;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// 210 bytes / block
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
static inline uchar4 get_scale_min_k4(int j, device const uint8_t * q) {
|
|
|
|
uchar4 r;
|
|
|
|
if (j < 4) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
r[0] = q[j+0] & 63;
|
|
|
|
r[2] = q[j+1] & 63;
|
|
|
|
r[1] = q[j+4] & 63;
|
|
|
|
r[3] = q[j+5] & 63;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
r[0] = (q[j+4] & 0xF) | ((q[j-4] >> 6) << 4);
|
|
|
|
r[2] = (q[j+5] & 0xF) | ((q[j-3] >> 6) << 4);
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
r[1] = (q[j+4] >> 4) | ((q[j-0] >> 6) << 4);
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
r[3] = (q[j+5] >> 4) | ((q[j+1] >> 6) << 4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return r;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
//====================================== dot products =========================
|
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q2_K_f32(
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r2 = tgpig.z;
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * N_SIMDGROUP + sgitg) * N_DST;
|
|
|
|
const int ib_row = first_row * nb;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q2_K * x = (device const block_q2_K *) src0 + ib_row + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[32];
|
|
|
|
float sumf[N_DST]={0.f}, all_sum;
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
const int step = sizeof(block_q2_K) * nb;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/8; // 0...3
|
|
|
|
const int it = tiisg%8; // 0...7
|
|
|
|
const int im = it/4; // 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
const int ir = it%4; // 0...3
|
|
|
|
const int is = (8*ir)/16;// 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const float * y4 = y + ix * QK_K + 128 * im + 8 * ir;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += 4) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float4 sumy = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
yl[i+ 0] = y4[i+ 0]; sumy[0] += yl[i+ 0];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+ 8] = y4[i+32]; sumy[1] += yl[i+ 8];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+16] = y4[i+64]; sumy[2] += yl[i+16];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+24] = y4[i+96]; sumy[3] += yl[i+24];
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * sc = (device const uint8_t *)x[ib].scales + 8*im + is;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].qs + 16 * im + 4 * ir;
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[ib].d;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; row++) {
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
float4 acc1 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
float4 acc2 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
|
|
|
|
acc1[0] += yl[i+ 0] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0003);
|
|
|
|
acc2[0] += yl[i+ 1] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0300);
|
|
|
|
acc1[1] += yl[i+ 8] * (qs[i/2] & 0x000c);
|
|
|
|
acc2[1] += yl[i+ 9] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0c00);
|
|
|
|
acc1[2] += yl[i+16] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0030);
|
|
|
|
acc2[2] += yl[i+17] * (qs[i/2] & 0x3000);
|
|
|
|
acc1[3] += yl[i+24] * (qs[i/2] & 0x00c0);
|
|
|
|
acc2[3] += yl[i+25] * (qs[i/2] & 0xc000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
float dall = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
float dmin = dh[1] * 1.f/16.f;
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += dall * ((acc1[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[0]) * (sc[0] & 0xF) * 1.f/ 1.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[1] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[1]) * (sc[2] & 0xF) * 1.f/ 4.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[2] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[2]) * (sc[4] & 0xF) * 1.f/16.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[3] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[3]) * (sc[6] & 0xF) * 1.f/64.f) -
|
|
|
|
dmin * (sumy[0] * (sc[0] & 0xF0) + sumy[1] * (sc[2] & 0xF0) + sumy[2] * (sc[4] & 0xF0) + sumy[3] * (sc[6] & 0xF0));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qs += step/2;
|
|
|
|
sc += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step/2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y4 += 4 * QK_K;
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/2; // 0...15
|
|
|
|
const int it = tiisg%2; // 0...1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const float * y4 = y + ix * QK_K + 8 * it;
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += 16) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
float4 sumy = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
yl[i+ 0] = y4[i+ 0]; sumy[0] += yl[i+ 0];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+ 8] = y4[i+16]; sumy[1] += yl[i+ 8];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+16] = y4[i+32]; sumy[2] += yl[i+16];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+24] = y4[i+48]; sumy[3] += yl[i+24];
|
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * sc = (device const uint8_t *)x[ib].scales;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].qs + 4 * it;
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[ib].d;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; row++) {
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
float4 acc1 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
float4 acc2 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
|
|
|
|
acc1[0] += yl[i+ 0] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0003);
|
|
|
|
acc2[0] += yl[i+ 1] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0300);
|
|
|
|
acc1[1] += yl[i+ 8] * (qs[i/2] & 0x000c);
|
|
|
|
acc2[1] += yl[i+ 9] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0c00);
|
|
|
|
acc1[2] += yl[i+16] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0030);
|
|
|
|
acc2[2] += yl[i+17] * (qs[i/2] & 0x3000);
|
|
|
|
acc1[3] += yl[i+24] * (qs[i/2] & 0x00c0);
|
|
|
|
acc2[3] += yl[i+25] * (qs[i/2] & 0xc000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
float dall = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
float dmin = dh[1];
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += dall * ((acc1[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[0]) * (sc[0] & 0xF) * 1.f/ 1.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[1] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[1]) * (sc[1] & 0xF) * 1.f/ 4.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[2] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[2]) * (sc[2] & 0xF) * 1.f/16.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[3] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[3]) * (sc[3] & 0xF) * 1.f/64.f) -
|
|
|
|
dmin * (sumy[0] * (sc[0] >> 4) + sumy[1] * (sc[1] >> 4) + sumy[2] * (sc[2] >> 4) + sumy[3] * (sc[3] >> 4));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qs += step/2;
|
|
|
|
sc += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step/2;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y4 += 16 * QK_K;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
all_sum = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = all_sum;
|
2023-07-21 09:44:40 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q3_K_f32(
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int64_t r2 = tgpig.z;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * N_SIMDGROUP + sgitg) * 2;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q3_K * x = (device const block_q3_K *) src0 + first_row*nb + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * yy = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[16];
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask1 = 0x0303;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask2 = 0x0f0f;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int tid = tiisg/2;
|
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg%2;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ip = tid/8; // 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
const int il = tid/2 - 4*ip; // 0...3
|
|
|
|
const int ir = tid%2;
|
|
|
|
const int n = 8;
|
|
|
|
const int l0 = n*ir;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint16_t m1 = 1 << (4*ip + il);
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t m2 = m1 << 8;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int shift = 2*il;
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint16_t qm1 = 0x0003 << shift;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t qm2 = 0x0300 << shift;
|
|
|
|
const int32_t v1 = 4 << shift;
|
|
|
|
const int32_t v2 = 1024 << shift;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t s_shift1 = 4*ip;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t s_shift2 = s_shift1 + 2*(il/2);
|
|
|
|
const int ik = 4 + (il%2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int q_offset = 32*ip + l0;
|
|
|
|
const int y_offset = 128*ip + 32*il + l0;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int step = sizeof(block_q3_K) * nb / 2;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y1 = yy + ix*QK_K + y_offset;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf1[2] = {0.f}, sumf2[2] = {0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 2) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 8; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
yl[l+0] = y1[l+ 0];
|
|
|
|
yl[l+8] = y1[l+16];
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * q = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].qs + q_offset);
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * h = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].hmask + l0);
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * a = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].scales);
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[i].d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < 2; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float d_all = (float)dh[0];
|
|
|
|
const char2 scales = as_type<char2>((uint16_t)(((a[il] >> s_shift1) & kmask2) | (((a[ik] >> s_shift2) & kmask1) << 4)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float s1 = 0, s2 = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < n; l += 2) {
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t qs = q[l/2];
|
|
|
|
s1 += yl[l+0] * ((int32_t)(qs & qm1) - ((h[l/2] & m1) ? 0 : v1));
|
|
|
|
s2 += yl[l+1] * ((int32_t)(qs & qm2) - ((h[l/2] & m2) ? 0 : v2));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
float d = d_all * (s1 + 1.f/256.f * s2);
|
|
|
|
sumf1[row] += d * scales[0];
|
|
|
|
sumf2[row] += d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s1 = s2 = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < n; l += 2) {
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t qs = q[l/2+8];
|
|
|
|
s1 += yl[l+8] * ((int32_t)(qs & qm1) - ((h[l/2+8] & m1) ? 0 : v1));
|
|
|
|
s2 += yl[l+9] * ((int32_t)(qs & qm2) - ((h[l/2+8] & m2) ? 0 : v2));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
d = d_all * (s1 + 1.f/256.f * s2);
|
|
|
|
sumf1[row] += d * scales[1];
|
|
|
|
sumf2[row] += d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q += step;
|
|
|
|
h += step;
|
|
|
|
a += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step;
|
|
|
|
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y1 += 2 * QK_K;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < 2; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
const float sumf = (sumf1[row] - 32.f*sumf2[row]) / (1 << shift);
|
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = tot;
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q3_K_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int64_t r2 = tgpig.z;
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int row = 2 * r0 + sgitg;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q3_K * x = (device const block_q3_K *) src0 + row*nb + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * yy = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/4;
|
|
|
|
const int il = 4 * (tiisg%4);// 0, 4, 8, 12
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
const int im = il/8; // 0, 0, 1, 1
|
|
|
|
const int in = il%8; // 0, 4, 0, 4
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
float2 sum = {0.f, 0.f};
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 8) {
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float d_all = (float)(x[i].d);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * q = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].qs + il);
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * h = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].hmask + in);
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * s = (device const uint16_t *)(x[i].scales);
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = yy + i * QK_K + il;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float d1 = d_all * ((int32_t)(s[0] & 0x000F) - 8);
|
|
|
|
const float d2 = d_all * ((int32_t)(s[0] & 0x00F0) - 128) * 1.f/64.f;
|
|
|
|
const float d3 = d_all * ((int32_t)(s[0] & 0x0F00) - 2048) * 1.f/4096.f;
|
|
|
|
const float d4 = d_all * ((int32_t)(s[0] & 0xF000) - 32768) * 1.f/262144.f;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 4; l += 2) {
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t hm = h[l/2] >> im;
|
|
|
|
sum[0] += y[l+ 0] * d1 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x0003) - ((hm & 0x0001) ? 0 : 4))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+16] * d2 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x000c) - ((hm & 0x0004) ? 0 : 16))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+32] * d3 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x0030) - ((hm & 0x0010) ? 0 : 64))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+48] * d4 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x00c0) - ((hm & 0x0040) ? 0 : 256));
|
|
|
|
sum[1] += y[l+ 1] * d1 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x0300) - ((hm & 0x0100) ? 0 : 1024))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+17] * d2 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x0c00) - ((hm & 0x0400) ? 0 : 4096))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+33] * d3 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0x3000) - ((hm & 0x1000) ? 0 : 16384))
|
|
|
|
+ y[l+49] * d4 * ((int32_t)(q[l/2] & 0xc000) - ((hm & 0x4000) ? 0 : 65536));
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const float sumf = sum[0] + sum[1] * 1.f/256.f;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + row] = tot;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-21 16:05:30 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-06-08 21:28:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q4_K_f32(
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask1 = 0x3f3f;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask2 = 0x0f0f;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask3 = 0xc0c0;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/8; // 0...3
|
|
|
|
const int it = tiisg%8; // 0...7
|
|
|
|
const int im = it/4; // 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
const int ir = it%4; // 0...3
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
const int r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r2 = tgpig.z;
|
2023-09-03 10:06:22 +02:00
|
|
|
//const int first_row = (r0 * N_SIMDGROUP + sgitg) * N_DST;
|
|
|
|
const int first_row = r0 * N_DST;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ib_row = first_row * nb;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q4_K * x = (device const block_q4_K *) src0 + ib_row + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[16];
|
|
|
|
float yh[16];
|
|
|
|
float sumf[N_DST]={0.f}, all_sum;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int step = sizeof(block_q4_K) * nb / 2;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y4 = y + ix * QK_K + 64 * im + 8 * ir;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
uint16_t sc16[4];
|
|
|
|
thread const uint8_t * sc8 = (thread const uint8_t *)sc16;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += 4) {
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
float4 sumy = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
yl[i+0] = y4[i+ 0]; sumy[0] += yl[i+0];
|
|
|
|
yl[i+8] = y4[i+ 32]; sumy[1] += yl[i+8];
|
|
|
|
yh[i+0] = y4[i+128]; sumy[2] += yh[i+0];
|
|
|
|
yh[i+8] = y4[i+160]; sumy[3] += yh[i+8];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * sc = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].scales + im;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * q1 = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].qs + 16 * im + 4 * ir;
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[ib].d;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; row++) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
sc16[0] = sc[0] & kmask1;
|
|
|
|
sc16[1] = sc[2] & kmask1;
|
|
|
|
sc16[2] = ((sc[4] >> 0) & kmask2) | ((sc[0] & kmask3) >> 2);
|
|
|
|
sc16[3] = ((sc[4] >> 4) & kmask2) | ((sc[2] & kmask3) >> 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * q2 = q1 + 32;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float4 acc1 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
float4 acc2 = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
|
|
|
|
acc1[0] += yl[i+0] * (q1[i/2] & 0x000F);
|
|
|
|
acc1[1] += yl[i+1] * (q1[i/2] & 0x0F00);
|
|
|
|
acc1[2] += yl[i+8] * (q1[i/2] & 0x00F0);
|
|
|
|
acc1[3] += yl[i+9] * (q1[i/2] & 0xF000);
|
|
|
|
acc2[0] += yh[i+0] * (q2[i/2] & 0x000F);
|
|
|
|
acc2[1] += yh[i+1] * (q2[i/2] & 0x0F00);
|
|
|
|
acc2[2] += yh[i+8] * (q2[i/2] & 0x00F0);
|
|
|
|
acc2[3] += yh[i+9] * (q2[i/2] & 0xF000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
float dall = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
float dmin = dh[1];
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += dall * ((acc1[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc1[1]) * sc8[0] +
|
|
|
|
(acc1[2] + 1.f/256.f * acc1[3]) * sc8[1] * 1.f/16.f +
|
|
|
|
(acc2[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[1]) * sc8[4] +
|
|
|
|
(acc2[2] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[3]) * sc8[5] * 1.f/16.f) -
|
|
|
|
dmin * (sumy[0] * sc8[2] + sumy[1] * sc8[3] + sumy[2] * sc8[6] + sumy[3] * sc8[7]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q1 += step;
|
|
|
|
sc += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
y4 += 4 * QK_K;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
all_sum = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = all_sum;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q4_K_f32(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/4; // 0...7
|
|
|
|
const int it = tiisg%4; // 0...3
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
const int r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r2 = tgpig.z;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * N_SIMDGROUP + sgitg) * N_DST;
|
|
|
|
const int ib_row = first_row * nb;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q4_K * x = (device const block_q4_K *) src0 + ib_row + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[8];
|
|
|
|
float yh[8];
|
|
|
|
float sumf[N_DST]={0.f}, all_sum;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
const int step = sizeof(block_q4_K) * nb / 2;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y4 = y + ix * QK_K + 8 * it;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
uint16_t sc16[4];
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int ib = ix; ib < nb; ib += 8) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float2 sumy = {0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
yl[i] = y4[i+ 0]; sumy[0] += yl[i];
|
|
|
|
yh[i] = y4[i+32]; sumy[1] += yh[i];
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * sc = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].scales;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = (device const uint16_t *)x[ib].qs + 4 * it;
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = x[ib].d;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; row++) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sc16[0] = sc[0] & 0x000f;
|
|
|
|
sc16[1] = sc[0] & 0x0f00;
|
|
|
|
sc16[2] = sc[0] & 0x00f0;
|
|
|
|
sc16[3] = sc[0] & 0xf000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float2 acc1 = {0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
float2 acc2 = {0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i += 2) {
|
|
|
|
acc1[0] += yl[i+0] * (qs[i/2] & 0x000F);
|
|
|
|
acc1[1] += yl[i+1] * (qs[i/2] & 0x0F00);
|
|
|
|
acc2[0] += yh[i+0] * (qs[i/2] & 0x00F0);
|
|
|
|
acc2[1] += yh[i+1] * (qs[i/2] & 0xF000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float dall = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
float dmin = dh[1];
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += dall * ((acc1[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc1[1]) * sc16[0] +
|
|
|
|
(acc2[0] + 1.f/256.f * acc2[1]) * sc16[1] * 1.f/4096.f) -
|
|
|
|
dmin * 1.f/16.f * (sumy[0] * sc16[2] + sumy[1] * sc16[3] * 1.f/256.f);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qs += step;
|
|
|
|
sc += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y4 += 8 * QK_K;
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < N_DST; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
all_sum = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0+ r2*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = all_sum;
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 09:08:23 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 14:18:43 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q5_K_f32(
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r2 = tgpig.z;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int first_row = (r0 * N_SIMDGROUP + sgitg) * 2;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q5_K * x = (device const block_q5_K *) src0 + first_row*nb + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * yy = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf[2]={0.f};
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int step = sizeof(block_q5_K) * nb;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
float yl[16], yh[16];
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask1 = 0x3f3f;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask2 = 0x0f0f;
|
|
|
|
const uint16_t kmask3 = 0xc0c0;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int tid = tiisg/4;
|
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg%4;
|
|
|
|
const int im = tid/4;
|
|
|
|
const int ir = tid%4;
|
|
|
|
const int n = 8;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int l0 = n*ir;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
const int q_offset = 32*im + l0;
|
|
|
|
const int y_offset = 64*im + l0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t hm1 = 1u << (2*im);
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t hm2 = hm1 << 1;
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t hm3 = hm1 << 4;
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t hm4 = hm2 << 4;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
uint16_t sc16[4];
|
|
|
|
thread const uint8_t * sc8 = (thread const uint8_t *)sc16;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y1 = yy + ix*QK_K + y_offset;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 4) {
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q1 = x[i].qs + q_offset;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * qh = x[i].qh + l0;
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[i].d;
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * a = (device const uint16_t *)x[i].scales + im;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y2 = y1 + 128;
|
|
|
|
float4 sumy = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 8; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
yl[l+0] = y1[l+ 0]; sumy[0] += yl[l+0];
|
|
|
|
yl[l+8] = y1[l+32]; sumy[1] += yl[l+8];
|
|
|
|
yh[l+0] = y2[l+ 0]; sumy[2] += yh[l+0];
|
|
|
|
yh[l+8] = y2[l+32]; sumy[3] += yh[l+8];
|
|
|
|
}
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < 2; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q2 = q1 + 64;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sc16[0] = a[0] & kmask1;
|
|
|
|
sc16[1] = a[2] & kmask1;
|
|
|
|
sc16[2] = ((a[4] >> 0) & kmask2) | ((a[0] & kmask3) >> 2);
|
|
|
|
sc16[3] = ((a[4] >> 4) & kmask2) | ((a[2] & kmask3) >> 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float4 acc = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < n; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
uint8_t h = qh[l];
|
|
|
|
acc[0] += yl[l+0] * ((uint16_t)(q1[l] & 0x0F) + (h & hm1 ? 16 : 0));
|
|
|
|
acc[1] += yl[l+8] * ((uint16_t)(q1[l] & 0xF0) + (h & hm2 ? 256 : 0));
|
|
|
|
acc[2] += yh[l+0] * ((uint16_t)(q2[l] & 0x0F) + (h & hm3 ? 16 : 0));
|
|
|
|
acc[3] += yh[l+8] * ((uint16_t)(q2[l] & 0xF0) + (h & hm4 ? 256 : 0));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const float dall = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
const float dmin = dh[1];
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += dall * (acc[0] * sc8[0] + acc[1] * sc8[1] * 1.f/16.f + acc[2] * sc8[4] + acc[3] * sc8[5] * 1.f/16.f) -
|
|
|
|
dmin * (sumy[0] * sc8[2] + sumy[1] * sc8[3] + sumy[2] * sc8[6] + sumy[3] * sc8[7]);
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
q1 += step;
|
|
|
|
qh += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step/2;
|
|
|
|
a += step/2;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y1 += 4 * QK_K;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
float yl[8], yh[8];
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int il = 4 * (tiisg/8); // 0, 4, 8, 12
|
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg%8;
|
|
|
|
const int im = il/8; // 0, 0, 1, 1
|
|
|
|
const int in = il%8; // 0, 4, 0, 4
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = yy + ix*QK_K + il;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 8) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 4; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
yl[l+0] = y[l+ 0];
|
|
|
|
yl[l+4] = y[l+16];
|
|
|
|
yh[l+0] = y[l+32];
|
|
|
|
yh[l+4] = y[l+48];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device const half * dh = &x[i].d;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q = x[i].qs + il;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * h = x[i].qh + in;
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * s = x[i].scales;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < 2; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float d = dh[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float2 acc = {0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 4; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t hl = h[l] >> im;
|
|
|
|
acc[0] += yl[l+0] * s[0] * ((int16_t)(q[l+ 0] & 0x0F) - (hl & 0x01 ? 0 : 16))
|
|
|
|
+ yl[l+4] * s[1] * ((int16_t)(q[l+16] & 0x0F) - (hl & 0x04 ? 0 : 16));
|
|
|
|
acc[1] += yh[l+0] * s[2] * ((int16_t)(q[l+ 0] & 0xF0) - (hl & 0x10 ? 0 : 256))
|
|
|
|
+ yh[l+4] * s[3] * ((int16_t)(q[l+16] & 0xF0) - (hl & 0x40 ? 0 : 256));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sumf[row] += d * (acc[0] + 1.f/16.f * acc[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q += step;
|
|
|
|
h += step;
|
|
|
|
s += step;
|
|
|
|
dh += step/2;
|
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y += 8 * QK_K;
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int row = 0; row < 2; ++row) {
|
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf[row]);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + first_row + row] = tot;
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mat_q6_K_f32(
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne01[[buffer(4)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02[[buffer(5)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne10[[buffer(9)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12[[buffer(11)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0[[buffer(15)]],
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1[[buffer(16)]],
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa[[buffer(17)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
uint tiisg[[thread_index_in_simdgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t kmask1 = 0x03;
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t kmask2 = 0x0C;
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t kmask3 = 0x30;
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t kmask4 = 0xC0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int nb = ne00/QK_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r0 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const int64_t r1 = tgpig.y;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const int r2 = tgpig.z;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int row = 2 * r0 + sgitg;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint offset0 = r2/gqa*(nb*ne0);
|
|
|
|
device const block_q6_K * x = (device const block_q6_K *) src0 + row * nb + offset0;
|
|
|
|
device const float * yy = (device const float *) src1 + r1*ne10 + r2*ne00*ne1;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
float sumf = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int tid = tiisg/2;
|
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg%2;
|
|
|
|
const int ip = tid/8; // 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
const int il = tid%8;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
const int n = 4;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
const int l0 = n*il;
|
|
|
|
const int is = 8*ip + l0/16;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const int y_offset = 128*ip + l0;
|
|
|
|
const int q_offset_l = 64*ip + l0;
|
|
|
|
const int q_offset_h = 32*ip + l0;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 2) {
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q1 = x[i].ql + q_offset_l;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q2 = q1 + 32;
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * qh = x[i].qh + q_offset_h;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
device const int8_t * sc = x[i].scales + is;
|
|
|
|
|
Metal implementation for all k_quants (#1807)
* metal : improve q4_K
28.3 -> 26.0 ms/token by avoiding a branch in the
calculation of the scales.
* metal : small improvement for Q4_K
* metal : still optimizing Q4_K
This commit pushes it down to 25.3 ms / token.
The crazy idea of using 6 bits for the scales is really costly on
Metal: if I remove the bit fiddling necessary to make the block
scales, time goes almost to the Q4_0 23 ms/token.
Before pushing the k-quants upstream I had a Q4_K variant that
had used 8-bit scales. It wasn't more accurate, used 0.125 bits more per weight,
was running slightly slower on the CPU (due to the larger model size
and being memory bound there), and the difference was entirely
negligible under CUDA. So, I decided to publish the version with 6-bit
scales. Perhaps I should re-consider and change to 8-bit scales?
* metal : some more optimizations
Q2_K: 25.4 ms/token
Q6_K: 27.3 ms/token
Q4_0: 22.8 ms/token
Q4_1: 23.1 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K support
Something is not quite right yet.
* metal : Q5_K support
Initial version achieves 31.2 ms/token, 210 GB/s
* metal : still not able to figure out why q3_K does not work
* Minor
* metal : yet another failed attempt to make q3_K work
* metal : optimize Q5_K
31.2 ms -> 27.8 ms.
250 GB/s.
* metal : q3_K still not working
Adding a heavily commented q3_K metal kernel to explain
my obviously faulty logic. Perhaps someone could spot the issue?
* metal : q3_K finally working
Not optimized at all.
What was the issue? The scales are not 4-bytes aligned,
and I was accessing them with a uint32_t pointer.
When I tried that on CUDA, I got an error (illegal memory access)
and added a memcpy to a local array of 3 uint32_t's.
But on Metal it told me there is no memcpy, so I tried
accessing directly. There is no error, just garbage results.
At some point I did try accessing the scales with an uint16_t
pointer (the scales are for sure 2-byte aligned), but was
still getting garbage. I guess, there must have been another bug.
No access to scales is via a uint16_t pointer and, after starting
from scratch from the C dequantize function, it finally works.
* metal : Q3_K 1st optimization pass
* metal : Q3_K second optimization pass - 29.6 ms/token
* metal : Q3_K cleanup
* metal : fixed accidentally broken Q2_K
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-12 21:39:21 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = yy + i * QK_K + y_offset;
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float dall = x[i].d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float4 sums = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < n; ++l) {
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
sums[0] += y[l+ 0] * ((int8_t)((q1[l] & 0xF) | ((qh[l] & kmask1) << 4)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[1] += y[l+32] * ((int8_t)((q2[l] & 0xF) | ((qh[l] & kmask2) << 2)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[2] += y[l+64] * ((int8_t)((q1[l] >> 4) | ((qh[l] & kmask3) << 0)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[3] += y[l+96] * ((int8_t)((q2[l] >> 4) | ((qh[l] & kmask4) >> 2)) - 32);
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sumf += dall * (sums[0] * sc[0] + sums[1] * sc[2] + sums[2] * sc[4] + sums[3] * sc[6]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const int ix = tiisg/4;
|
|
|
|
const int il = 4*(tiisg%4);
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
for (int i = ix; i < nb; i += 8) {
|
k-quants : support for super-block size of 64 (#2001)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K scalar and AVX2 works
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K scalar and AVX2 works. Q2_K is way too slow (it is actually slower
than the scalar implementation)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K scalar and AVX2 works.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K scalar and AVX2 works, and with that all
k_quants are done on AVX2 and scalar
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on CUDA. Cannot make it run quite as gast as
with super-blocks with 256 weigths: 8% slower on 4080,
20% slower on the 1660 (but there we fit 1 less layer on the
GPU because pf the larger model size), so some fraction of
these 20% is due to that,
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on CUDA. ~10% slower on GTX-1660,
16% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on CUDA. ~3% slower on GTX-1660,
10% slower on 4080.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on CUDA.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on CUDA, and with this CUDA is done.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q6_K working on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K working on ARM_NEON, but quite a bit slower than 256 weights.
With that, we have full support for ARM_NEON, although
performance is not quite there.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Slightly more efficient Q3_K and Q5_K
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Another small improvement for Q3_K and Q5_K on ARM_NEON
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Yet another speedup for Q5_K on ARM_NEON.
We are now within 10% of the QK_K = 256 version.
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
* We are able to pass preprocessor macros to the Metal
compiler
* Q6_K works and is actually slightly more efficient than
the QK_K = 256 version (25.2 ms vs 25.8 ms)
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q4_K works on Metal and is actually slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (21.95 ms vs 24.0 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q2_K works on Metal and is very slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.8 ms vs 24.2 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q3_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (26.6 ms vs 28.3 ms).
* k_quants: WIP super-blocks with 64 weights
Q5_K works on Metal and is slightly faster
than QK_K = 256 (23.7 ms vs 26.3 ms).
* k_quants: call them _K, not _k, also on Metal
* k_quants: correctly define QK_K in llama.cpp
* Fixed bug in q4_K quantization added with the 64-block addition
* Simplify via lambda
* k_quants: swicth Q3_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Otherwise there isn't much benefit from this
quantization type. There is some very slight loss
in accuracy, but we reduce size by ~7%.
E.g., for OpenLLaMA-3B, Q3_K_S perplexity is
8.6131 with 8-bit scales and 8.6352 with 4-bit,
while file size decreases from 1.53G to 1.44G.
* k_quants: switch Q4_K to 4-bit scales when QK_K = 64
Here the loss in accuracy is greater than for Q3_K,
but the Q4_K points still move further to the left on
the perplexity vs size curve.
* k_quants: forgot to add the Metal changes in last commit
* k_quants: change Q5_K to be type 0 when QK_K = 64
Still needs AVX2 implementation
* k_quants: AVX2 implementation for new 64-weight Q5_K
* k_quants: 10% faster ARM_NEON Q5_K dot product
* k_quants: fixed issue caused by merging with master
---------
Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
2023-06-26 18:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
device const float * y = yy + i * QK_K + il;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * ql = x[i].ql + il;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * qh = x[i].qh + il;
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * s = x[i].scales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const float d = x[i].d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
float4 sums = {0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 0.f};
|
|
|
|
for (int l = 0; l < 4; ++l) {
|
|
|
|
sums[0] += y[l+ 0] * ((int8_t)((ql[l+ 0] & 0xF) | ((qh[l] & kmask1) << 4)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[1] += y[l+16] * ((int8_t)((ql[l+16] & 0xF) | ((qh[l] & kmask2) << 2)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[2] += y[l+32] * ((int8_t)((ql[l+ 0] >> 4) | ((qh[l] & kmask3) >> 0)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
sums[3] += y[l+48] * ((int8_t)((ql[l+16] >> 4) | ((qh[l] & kmask4) >> 2)) - 32);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sumf += d * (sums[0] * s[0] + sums[1] * s[1] + sums[2] * s[2] + sums[3] * s[3]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-20 17:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const float tot = simd_sum(sumf);
|
|
|
|
if (tiisg == 0) {
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
dst[r1*ne0 + r2*ne0*ne1 + row] = tot;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//============================= templates and their specializations =============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_f16(device const half4x4 * src, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
half4x4 temp = *(((device half4x4 *)src));
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++){
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = temp[i/4][i%4];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q4_0(device const block_q4_0 *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = ((device const uint16_t *)xb + 1);
|
|
|
|
const half d = il ? (xb->d / 16.h) : xb->d;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
const half m = il ? ( -8.h * 16.h) : -8.h;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
const ushort mask0 = il ? 0x00F0 : 0x000F;
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask1 = il ? 0xF000 : 0x0F00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i=0;i<8;i++) {
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
reg[i/2][2*(i%2)] = (((qs[i] & mask0) ) + m) * d;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
reg[i/2][2*(i%2)+1] = (((qs[i] & mask1) >> 8) + m) * d;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q4_1(device const block_q4_1 *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
device const uint16_t * qs = ((device const uint16_t *)xb + 2);
|
|
|
|
const half d = il ? (xb->d / 16.h) : xb->d;
|
|
|
|
const half m = xb->m;
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask0 = il ? 0x00F0 : 0x000F;
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask1 = il ? 0xF000 : 0x0F00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i=0;i<8;i++) {
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
reg[i/2][2*(i%2)] = (((qs[i] & mask0) ) * d) + m;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
reg[i/2][2*(i%2)+1] = (((qs[i] & mask1) >> 8) * d) + m;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q8_0(device const block_q8_0 *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * qs = ((device const int8_t *)xb->qs);
|
|
|
|
const half d = xb->d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i=0;i<16;i++) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = (qs[i + 16*il] * d);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q2_K(device const block_q2_K *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
const half d = xb->d;
|
|
|
|
const half min = xb->dmin;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q = (device const uint8_t *)xb->qs;
|
|
|
|
half dl, ml;
|
|
|
|
uint8_t sc = xb->scales[il];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
q = q + 32*(il/8) + 16*(il&1);
|
|
|
|
il = (il/2)%4;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
half coef = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 1/64.h : 1/16.h) : (il>0 ? 1/4.h : 1.h);
|
|
|
|
uchar mask = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 192 : 48) : (il>0 ? 12 : 3);
|
|
|
|
dl = d * (sc & 0xF) * coef, ml = min * (sc >> 4);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = dl * (q[i] & mask) - ml;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q3_K(device const block_q3_K *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
const float d_all = (float)(xb->d);
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q = (device const uint8_t *)xb->qs;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * h = (device const uint8_t *)xb->hmask;
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * scales = (device const int8_t *)xb->scales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
q = q + 32 * (il/8) + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
h = h + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
uint8_t m = 1 << (il/2);
|
|
|
|
uint16_t kmask1 = (il/4)>1 ? ((il/4)>2 ? 192 : 48) : \
|
|
|
|
((il/4)>0 ? 12 : 3);
|
|
|
|
uint16_t kmask2 = il/8 ? 0xF0 : 0x0F;
|
|
|
|
uint16_t scale_2 = scales[il%8], scale_1 = scales[8 + il%4];
|
|
|
|
int16_t dl_int = (il/4)&1 ? (scale_2&kmask2) | ((scale_1&kmask1) << 2) : \
|
|
|
|
(scale_2&kmask2) | ((scale_1&kmask1) << 4);
|
|
|
|
float dl = il<8 ? d_all * (dl_int - 32.f) : d_all * (dl_int / 16.f - 32.f);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
il = (il/2)%4;
|
|
|
|
float coef = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 1/64.h : 1/16.h) : (il>0 ? 1/4.h : 1.h);
|
|
|
|
uint8_t mask = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 192 : 48) : (il>0 ? 12 : 3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = coef * dl * ((q[i] & mask) - ((h[i] & m) ? 0 : 4.f/coef));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
float kcoef = il&1 ? 1.f/16.f : 1.f;
|
|
|
|
uint16_t kmask = il&1 ? 0xF0 : 0x0F;
|
|
|
|
float dl = d_all * ((scales[il/2] & kmask) * kcoef - 8);
|
|
|
|
float coef = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 1/64.h : 1/16.h) : (il>0 ? 1/4.h : 1.h);
|
|
|
|
uint8_t mask = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 192 : 48) : (il>0 ? 12 : 3);
|
|
|
|
uint8_t m = 1<<(il*2);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = coef * dl * ((q[i] & mask) - ((h[i%8] & (m * (1 + i/8))) ? 0 : 4.f/coef));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q4_K(device const block_q4_K *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q = xb->qs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
const float d = (float)(xb->d);
|
|
|
|
const float min = (float)(xb->dmin);
|
|
|
|
short is = (il/4) * 2;
|
|
|
|
q = q + (il/4) * 32 + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
il = il%4;
|
|
|
|
const uchar4 sc = get_scale_min_k4(is, xb->scales);
|
|
|
|
const float dl = il<2 ? d * sc[0] : d * sc[2]/16.h;
|
|
|
|
const float ml = il<2 ? min * sc[1] : min * sc[3];
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
q = q + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * s = xb->scales;
|
|
|
|
device const half2 * dh = (device const half2 *)xb->d;
|
|
|
|
const float2 d = (float2)dh[0];
|
|
|
|
const float dl = il<2 ? d[0] * (s[0]&0xF) : d[0] * (s[1]&0xF)/16.h;
|
|
|
|
const float ml = il<2 ? d[1] * (s[0]>>4) : d[1 ]* (s[1]>>4);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask = il<2 ? 0x0F : 0xF0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = dl * (q[i] & mask) - ml;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q5_K(device const block_q5_K *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * q = xb->qs;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * qh = xb->qh;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
const float d = (float)(xb->d);
|
|
|
|
const float min = (float)(xb->dmin);
|
|
|
|
short is = (il/4) * 2;
|
|
|
|
q = q + 32 * (il/4) + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
qh = qh + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ul = 1 << (il/2);
|
|
|
|
il = il%4;
|
|
|
|
const uchar4 sc = get_scale_min_k4(is, xb->scales);
|
|
|
|
const float dl = il<2 ? d * sc[0] : d * sc[2]/16.h;
|
|
|
|
const float ml = il<2 ? min * sc[1] : min * sc[3];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask = il<2 ? 0x0F : 0xF0;
|
|
|
|
const float qh_val = il<2 ? 16.f : 256.f;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = dl * ((q[i] & mask) + (qh[i] & ul ? qh_val : 0)) - ml;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
q = q + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * s = xb->scales;
|
|
|
|
const float dl = xb->d * s[il];
|
|
|
|
uint8_t m = 1<<(il*2);
|
|
|
|
const float coef = il<2 ? 1.f : 1.f/16.f;
|
|
|
|
const ushort mask = il<2 ? 0x0F : 0xF0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = coef * dl * ((q[i] & mask) - (qh[i%8] & (m*(1+i/8)) ? 0.f : 16.f/coef));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename type4x4>
|
|
|
|
void dequantize_q6_K(device const block_q6_K *xb, short il, thread type4x4 & reg) {
|
|
|
|
const float d_all = (float)(xb->d);
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * ql = (device const uint8_t *)xb->ql;
|
|
|
|
device const uint8_t * qh = (device const uint8_t *)xb->qh;
|
|
|
|
device const int8_t * scales = (device const int8_t *)xb->scales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
ql = ql + 64*(il/8) + 32*((il/2)&1) + 16*(il&1);
|
|
|
|
qh = qh + 32*(il/8) + 16*(il&1);
|
|
|
|
float sc = scales[(il%2) + 2 * ((il/2))];
|
|
|
|
il = (il/2)%4;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
ql = ql + 16 * (il&1);
|
|
|
|
float sc = scales[il];
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
uint16_t kmask1 = il>1 ? (il>2 ? 192 : 48) : (il>0 ? 12 : 3);
|
|
|
|
uint16_t kmask2 = il>1 ? 0xF0 : 0x0F;
|
|
|
|
const float coef = il>1 ? 1.f/16.f : 1.f;
|
|
|
|
float q = il&1 ? ((ql[i]&kmask2)|((qh[i]&kmask1)<<2)) - 32.f/coef : \
|
|
|
|
((ql[i]&kmask2)|((qh[i]&kmask1)<<4)) - 32.f/coef;
|
|
|
|
reg[i/4][i%4] = d_all * sc * q * coef;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template<typename block_q, short nl, void (*dequantize_func)(device const block_q *, short, thread float4x4 &)>
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_get_rows(
|
|
|
|
device const void * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const int * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t & nb1,
|
|
|
|
uint tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tiitg[[thread_index_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint tptg[[threads_per_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
const int i = tgpig;
|
|
|
|
const int r = ((device int32_t *) src1)[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int ind = tiitg; ind < ne00/16; ind += tptg) {
|
|
|
|
float4x4 temp;
|
|
|
|
dequantize_func(
|
|
|
|
((device const block_q *) ((device char *) src0 + r*nb01)) + ind/nl, ind%nl, temp);
|
|
|
|
*(((device float4x4 *) ((device char *) dst + i*nb1)) + ind) = temp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define BLOCK_SIZE_M 64 // 8 simdgroup matrices from matrix A
|
|
|
|
#define BLOCK_SIZE_N 32 // 4 simdgroup matrices from matrix A
|
|
|
|
#define BLOCK_SIZE_K 32
|
|
|
|
#define THREAD_MAT_M 4 // each thread take 4 simdgroup matrices from matrix A
|
|
|
|
#define THREAD_MAT_N 2 // each thread take 2 simdgroup matrices from matrix B
|
|
|
|
#define THREAD_PER_BLOCK 128
|
|
|
|
#define THREAD_PER_ROW 2 // 2 thread for each row in matrix A to load numbers
|
|
|
|
#define THREAD_PER_COL 4 // 4 thread for each row in matrix B to load numbers
|
|
|
|
#define SG_MAT_SIZE 64 // simdgroup matrix is of shape 8x8
|
|
|
|
#define SG_MAT_ROW 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// each block_q contains 16*nl weights
|
|
|
|
template<typename block_q, short nl, void (*dequantize_func)(device const block_q *, short, thread half4x4 &)>
|
|
|
|
kernel void kernel_mul_mm(device const uchar * src0,
|
|
|
|
device const float * src1,
|
|
|
|
device float * dst,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne00,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & nb01,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & nb02,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne12,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne0,
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t & ne1,
|
|
|
|
constant uint & gqa,
|
|
|
|
threadgroup uchar * shared_memory [[threadgroup(0)]],
|
|
|
|
uint3 tgpig[[threadgroup_position_in_grid]],
|
|
|
|
uint tiitg[[thread_index_in_threadgroup]],
|
|
|
|
uint sgitg[[simdgroup_index_in_threadgroup]]) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threadgroup half * sa = ((threadgroup half *)shared_memory);
|
|
|
|
threadgroup float * sb = (threadgroup float *)(shared_memory + 4096);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint r0 = tgpig.y;
|
|
|
|
const uint r1 = tgpig.x;
|
|
|
|
const uint im = tgpig.z;
|
|
|
|
// if this block is of 64x32 shape or smaller
|
|
|
|
short n_rows = (ne0 - r0 * BLOCK_SIZE_M < BLOCK_SIZE_M) ? (ne0 - r0 * BLOCK_SIZE_M) : BLOCK_SIZE_M;
|
|
|
|
short n_cols = (ne1 - r1 * BLOCK_SIZE_N < BLOCK_SIZE_N) ? (ne1 - r1 * BLOCK_SIZE_N) : BLOCK_SIZE_N;
|
|
|
|
// a thread shouldn't load data outside of the matrix
|
|
|
|
short thread_row = ((short)tiitg/THREAD_PER_ROW) < n_rows ? ((short)tiitg/THREAD_PER_ROW) : n_rows - 1;
|
|
|
|
short thread_col = ((short)tiitg/THREAD_PER_COL) < n_cols ? ((short)tiitg/THREAD_PER_COL) : n_cols - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_half8x8 ma[4];
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_float8x8 mb[2];
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_float8x8 c_res[8];
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++){
|
|
|
|
c_res[i] = make_filled_simdgroup_matrix<float, 8>(0.f);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
short il = (tiitg % THREAD_PER_ROW);
|
|
|
|
uint offset0 = im/gqa*nb02; ushort offset1 = il/nl;
|
|
|
|
device const block_q * x = (device const block_q *)(src0 + (r0 * BLOCK_SIZE_M + thread_row) * nb01 + offset0) + offset1;
|
|
|
|
device const float * y = src1 + (r1 * BLOCK_SIZE_N + thread_col) * ne00 \
|
|
|
|
+ BLOCK_SIZE_K / THREAD_PER_COL * (tiitg % THREAD_PER_COL) + im * ne00 * ne1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int loop_k = 0; loop_k < ne00; loop_k += BLOCK_SIZE_K) {
|
|
|
|
//load data and store to threadgroup memory
|
|
|
|
half4x4 temp_a;
|
|
|
|
dequantize_func(x, il, temp_a);
|
2023-08-22 08:18:40 +02:00
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
#pragma unroll(16)
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
|
|
|
|
*(sa + SG_MAT_SIZE * ((tiitg / THREAD_PER_ROW / 8) \
|
|
|
|
+ 16 * (tiitg % THREAD_PER_ROW) + 8 * (i / 8)) \
|
|
|
|
+ (tiitg / THREAD_PER_ROW) % 8 + (i & 7) * 8) = temp_a[i/4][i%4];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*(threadgroup float2x4 *)(sb + (tiitg % THREAD_PER_COL) * 8 * 32 + 8 * (tiitg / THREAD_PER_COL)) \
|
|
|
|
= *((device float2x4 *)y);
|
|
|
|
il = (il + 2 < nl) ? il + 2 : il % 2;
|
|
|
|
x = (il < 2) ? x + (2+nl-1)/nl : x;
|
|
|
|
y += BLOCK_SIZE_K;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
|
|
|
//load matrices from threadgroup memory and conduct outer products
|
|
|
|
threadgroup half * lsma = (sa + THREAD_MAT_M * SG_MAT_SIZE * (sgitg % 2));
|
|
|
|
threadgroup float * lsmb = (sb + THREAD_MAT_N * SG_MAT_SIZE * (sgitg / 2));
|
|
|
|
#pragma unroll(4)
|
|
|
|
for (int ik = 0; ik < BLOCK_SIZE_K / 8; ik++) {
|
|
|
|
#pragma unroll(4)
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_load(ma[i],lsma + SG_MAT_SIZE * i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_none);
|
|
|
|
#pragma unroll(2)
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_load(mb[i],lsmb + SG_MAT_SIZE * i);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsma += BLOCK_SIZE_M / SG_MAT_ROW * SG_MAT_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
lsmb += BLOCK_SIZE_N / SG_MAT_ROW * SG_MAT_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
#pragma unroll(8)
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++){
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_multiply_accumulate(c_res[i], mb[i/4], ma[i%4], c_res[i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((r0 + 1) * BLOCK_SIZE_M <= ne0 && (r1 + 1) * BLOCK_SIZE_N <= ne1) {
|
|
|
|
device float *C = dst + BLOCK_SIZE_M * r0 + 32 * (sgitg&1) \
|
|
|
|
+ (BLOCK_SIZE_N * r1 + 16 * (sgitg>>1)) * ne0 + im*ne1*ne0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_store(c_res[i], C + 8 * (i%4) + 8 * ne0 * (i/4), ne0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// block is smaller than 64x32, we should avoid writing data outside of the matrix
|
2023-08-22 08:18:40 +02:00
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
threadgroup float *temp_str = ((threadgroup float *)shared_memory) \
|
|
|
|
+ 32 * (sgitg&1) + (16 * (sgitg>>1)) * BLOCK_SIZE_M;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
|
|
|
|
simdgroup_store(c_res[i], temp_str + 8 * (i%4) + 8 * BLOCK_SIZE_M * (i/4), BLOCK_SIZE_M);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-22 08:18:40 +02:00
|
|
|
threadgroup_barrier(mem_flags::mem_threadgroup);
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
device float *C = dst + BLOCK_SIZE_M * r0 + (BLOCK_SIZE_N * r1) * ne0 + im*ne1*ne0;
|
|
|
|
if (sgitg==0) {
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n_rows; i++) {
|
|
|
|
for (int j = tiitg; j< n_cols; j += BLOCK_SIZE_N) {
|
|
|
|
*(C + i + j * ne0) = *(temp_str + i + j * BLOCK_SIZE_M);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-08 18:46:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if QK_K == 256
|
|
|
|
#define QK_NL 16
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define QK_NL 4
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef void (get_rows_t)(device const void *, device const int *, device float *, constant int64_t &, \
|
|
|
|
constant uint64_t &, constant uint64_t &, uint, uint, uint);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_f16")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<half4x4, 1, dequantize_f16>;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q4_0")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q4_0, 2, dequantize_q4_0>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q4_1")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q4_1, 2, dequantize_q4_1>;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q8_0")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q8_0, 2, dequantize_q8_0>;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q2_K")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q2_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q2_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q3_K")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q3_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q3_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q4_K")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q4_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q4_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q5_K")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q5_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q5_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_get_rows_q6_K")]] kernel get_rows_t kernel_get_rows<block_q6_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q6_K>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef void (mat_mm_t)(device const uchar *, device const float *, device float *, constant int64_t &,\
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t &, constant int64_t &, constant int64_t &, constant int64_t &, \
|
|
|
|
constant int64_t &, constant int64_t &, constant uint &, threadgroup uchar *, uint3, uint, uint);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_f16_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<half4x4, 1, dequantize_f16>;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q4_0_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q4_0, 2, dequantize_q4_0>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q4_1_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q4_1, 2, dequantize_q4_1>;
|
2023-08-24 15:19:57 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q8_0_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q8_0, 2, dequantize_q8_0>;
|
2023-08-16 22:07:04 +02:00
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q2_K_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q2_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q2_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q3_K_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q3_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q3_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q4_K_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q4_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q4_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q5_K_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q5_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q5_K>;
|
|
|
|
template [[host_name("kernel_mul_mm_q6_K_f32")]] kernel mat_mm_t kernel_mul_mm<block_q6_K, QK_NL, dequantize_q6_K>;
|